You can find the final bill analysis which states near the beginning:
Assembly Amendments require the project be consistent with the most recent long
range development plan (LRDP) or master plan environmental impact report (EIR)
and any applicable tiered environmental analysis, as specified; require an
independent third-party to evaluate if the project results in net additional emission
of greenhouse gases, instead of the California Air Resources Board; prohibit a
certificate of occupancy be issued unless the lead agency receives certification of
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) platinum and determines
that the construction impacts have been fully mitigated; and limit the exemption to
projects with 2,000 units or less or 4,000 beds or less.
Like many bills, this one was modified as it passed through various State Senate and Assembly committees. There is a tab in the link above that allows you to compare the various changes made along the way.
If yous go to the link I mentioned:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billVersionsCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202120220SB886
You can find the final bill analysis which states near the beginning:
Assembly Amendments require the project be consistent with the most recent long
range development plan (LRDP) or master plan environmental impact report (EIR)
and any applicable tiered environmental analysis, as specified; require an
independent third-party to evaluate if the project results in net additional emission
of greenhouse gases, instead of the California Air Resources Board; prohibit a
certificate of occupancy be issued unless the lead agency receives certification of
LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) platinum and determines
that the construction impacts have been fully mitigated; and limit the exemption to
projects with 2,000 units or less or 4,000 beds or less.
Like many bills, this one was modified as it passed through various State Senate and Assembly committees. There is a tab in the link above that allows you to compare the various changes made along the way.
these all seem fine? I can't seem to understand your objection sorry